![]() ![]() A suggestin l expect to see posted is try it for yourself. would THAT have the analog sound embeded within the track? or would the conversion and samples CHOP EM OUT? īUT! what if i recorded the tracks on to my tascam 388 (4th inch) then dumped it on to cubase at highest res. The reason i believed 192 can boost more to the analog sound is just getting more samples of the sound. Some just dont really understand the difference. Trying to say I'd hit up lunch lady Doris before I'd roll with a blow up doll. I don't care how hot and realistic your plastic vagina is. Still got nothing on when you get phat tunes from a piece of spinning floor covering. Sometimes digital can give you clean accurate nice sound. I'd rather have a steam engine making nasty background noise in the room with me and be listening to a hissy tape than some of the digital crap I hear. Listen to the sound, listen to the way the sound comes at you, listen to how smooth the transients are. ![]() Though there have been many good reviews about Reaper, I find Reaper to be the DAW I’d stay away from. Reaper FM is considerably lower priced compared to the other major DAWs and is a flexible plus lightweight DAW. Greener wrote: Shove the noise floor up your nose. With powerful editing tools and even a built in score editor, Cubase is pretty much complete for MIDI composing. I like having a sheet of paper showing me what tracks there are. Yes, Nuendo 4 costs twice as much as Cubase 4.įor me, the only thing Nuendo has that I want in Cubase is Track Sheets. Nuendo does have features that Cubase doesn't.some of which would likely be helpful but to me, NONE of the things make it worth spending twice as much for it. It's great that it's now in Cubase and a big plus Notation is also something that's not included with Nuendo and only available in the expansion.Ĭubase 4 has the "control room' feature which previously was only available in Nuendo. If you do things like MIDI drum editing and have Nuendo you'll need to buy an expansion pack because it's not included. It's from version 3 (not the current 4 version) but you can get an idea of some of the things that Nuendo has that Cubase doesn't. Nuendo has more features that are meant for people doing post production. There is Cubase 4 which is their flagship audio software and by no means cheap, but then it has lesser versions that are for the more buget conscious.Ĭubase is really geared towards Audio production while Nuendo is geared towards Post Production. I have to disagree about Cubase being Steinberg's buget audio software. When comparing Cubase vs Reaper, the Slant community recommends Reaper for most people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |